- Published on
There is nothing normal about this distribution
- Authors
- Name
- Kubera Research
- @KubeRese
The assumption that stock returns follow a normal distribution is foundational in finance, underpinning various models, strategies, and risk management techniques. A normal distribution, characterized by its mean and variance, is symmetrical and bell-shaped, implying that returns cluster around the average with diminishing frequencies as they deviate further. This assumption is based on the notion that investors act rationally and markets efficiently incorporate new information, leading to a normal distribution of returns as the aggregate outcome of countless individual investment decisions.
However, empirical data challenges the normality assumption in stock returns, highlighting several key anomalies. For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, stock markets experienced extreme losses far beyond what a normal distribution would predict, illustrating the concept of "fat tails," where extreme returns occur more frequently than expected. Additionally, stock returns often exhibit volatility clustering, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, where periods of intense market volatility were closely followed by similar periods, contradicting the normal distribution's expectation of independent and identically distributed returns. Events like the sudden crash on Black Monday in 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by over 22% in a single day, showcase rapid, extreme price movements that the normal distribution fails to account for.
Given these deviations from normality, nonlinear and chaos models are often more effective in capturing the true behavior of stock markets. Such models can accommodate the complexities of fat tails, volatility clustering, and extreme events. For instance, historical simulations can better reflect potential outcomes by using real past data, such as replicating scenarios from past crises. Monte Carlo simulations, which generate a wide range of potential future outcomes based on random sampling, can model fat tails and other non-normal behaviors. Extreme value theory, which focuses on the statistical behavior of extreme deviations, is particularly useful in estimating the likelihood of rare, catastrophic events. By employing these robust tools, investors can more accurately assess risk and make informed decisions, avoiding the pitfalls of relying solely on the normal distribution and its simplistic assumptions. This approach acknowledges the intricate, chaotic nature of financial markets, leading to more resilient investment strategies and risk management practices.